to main content Credentialing and Privileging - Peer Recommendations (AHC) | Office Based Surgery | Human Resources HR | The Joint Commission
Credentialing and Privileging - Peer Recommendations (AHC)

Who can provide peer recommendations for independent or non-independent allied health practitioners such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and psychologists, midwives, and social workers when there is no other similar practitioner on staff?

Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.

The definition of a peer (see HR 02.01.03 EP 6) is someone from the same discipline. For example, physicians for physicians, dentists for dentists, podiatrists for podiatrists, etc. It does not have to be someone in the same specialty (orthopedist, etc.).

To be able to provide a recommendation, the peer must be familiar with the individual's actual performance.  For a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, psychologist or social worker, ideally, this would be an individual from the same discipline.  Therefore, the organization should attempt to obtain such recommendations. This could be an individual from within the same organization or someone from outside the organization.  The organization determines the number of required peer recommendations. 

In situations where there is no nurse practitioner, physician assistant, psychologist, or social worker to provide a peer recommendation, it is acceptable for a physician with like qualifications that is familiar with the practitioner's performance, to provide the recommendation. For example, an internist could provide a recommendation for a physician assistant, an anesthesiologist for a nurse anesthetist, a psychiatrist for a psychologist, and a psychologist, with similar responsibilities, could provide a recommendation for a social worker.



 
Manual: Office Based Surgery
Chapter: Human Resources HR
First published date: December 28, 2017 This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on October 14, 2023 with update notes of: Editorial changes only Types of changes and an explanation of change type: Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. | Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. | Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Was this response helpful?

If no, please comment on how we could improve this response.

If you have additional standards-related questions regarding this topic, please use the Standards Online Submission Form

Get Extra Help with Books and E-books

Browse our gallery of books and e-books to find trusted prep and readiness resources, practical checklists and toolkits, and resources on specialized health care topics.

Stay Informed with Online Education

Online education is the most convenient and cost-effective way to educate your staff and minimize expenses without the need to leave your organization.

Reach Your Safety Goals with eProducts

Assessing and sustaining compliance with accreditation standards or CMS CoPs can be a challenge, but it doesn’t have to be. Rely on our proven software solutions developed by our team of industry experts.

Can't Find What You're Looking For?

If you do not find an answer to your question, please contact the Standards Interpretation Group (SIG).

Note: To provide adequate support to those organizations that are either accredited/certified or seeking accreditation/certification, we will only answer those questions submitted by those organizations seeking accreditation/certification or currently accredited/certified by the Joint Commission. The Joint Commission no longer answers questions submitted by students or vendors. Thank you for your understanding.