to main content Refrigerator - Design Quality | Home Care | Environment of Care EC | The Joint Commission
Refrigerator - Design Quality

What is The Joint Commission standard for specific design quality, criteria for both clinical and non-clinical use of refrigerators?

Any examples are for illustrative purposes only

The Joint Commission does not require specific design or quality criteria for refrigerators that organizations decide to purchase. 

It is recognized that medication or laboratory refrigerators would likely require a significantly higher level of design quality than a food refrigerator in order to maintain specific temperature ranges. Although not specifically required, refrigerators marketed by manufacturers to be medical grade typically are designed provide precise temperature control, and are constructed of more durable components (like metal construction, typically stainless steel). 

Starting with an assessment of the items and products to be stored, the organization would be able to select the most appropriate level of quality and functionality for refrigerators to ensure proper consistent temperature conditions. 

The Joint Commission concurs with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendation not to store vaccines in a dormitory-style or bar-style refrigerator.  A dormitory-style refrigerator is defined as a combination refrigerator and freezer unit that is typically outfitted with one exterior door and an evaporator plate (cooling coil), which is usually located inside the freezer compartment. Performance testing revealed that this type of design results in generally unacceptable levels performance in maintaining a consistent temperature regardless of where vaccines were placed in the refrigerator 

Additional Resources:
EC.02.06.01
Click here to visit the CDC website Vaccine Storage and Handling Resources
 
Manual: Home Care
Chapter: Environment of Care EC
First published date: April 11, 2016 This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on September 12, 2022 with update notes of: Editorial changes only Types of changes and an explanation of change type: Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. | Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. | Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.
Was this response helpful?

If no, please comment on how we could improve this response.

If you have additional standards-related questions regarding this topic, please use the Standards Online Submission Form

Get Extra Help with Books and E-books

Browse our gallery of books and e-books to find trusted prep and readiness resources, practical checklists and toolkits, and resources on specialized health care topics.

Stay Informed with Online Education

Online education is the most convenient and cost-effective way to educate your staff and minimize expenses without the need to leave your organization.

Reach Your Safety Goals with eProducts

Assessing and sustaining compliance with accreditation standards or CMS CoPs can be a challenge, but it doesn’t have to be. Rely on our proven software solutions developed by our team of industry experts.

Can't Find What You're Looking For?

If you do not find an answer to your question, please contact the Standards Interpretation Group (SIG).

Note: To provide adequate support to those organizations that are either accredited/certified or seeking accreditation/certification, we will only answer those questions submitted by those organizations seeking accreditation/certification or currently accredited/certified by the Joint Commission. The Joint Commission no longer answers questions submitted by students or vendors. Thank you for your understanding.